green numbers give full details.     |    back to list of philosophers     |     expand these ideas

Ideas of Michael Smith, by Text

[Australian, b.1954, At Oxford, Princeton, Monash Universities; then Professor at Australian National University.]

1994 The Moral Problem
1.10 p.44 Analysis aims to express the full set of platitudes surrounding a given concept
1.3 p.8 A pure desire could be criticised if it were based on a false belief
1.3 p.8 In the Humean account, desires are not true/false, or subject to any rational criticism
2.4 p.24 Expressivists count attitudes as 'moral' if they concern features of things, rather than their mere existence
3.1 p.61 Moral internalism says a judgement of rightness is thereby motivating
3.1 p.62 'Rationalism' says the rightness of an action is a reason to perform it
3.1 p.63 'Externalists' say moral judgements are not reasons, and maybe not even motives
3.3 p.67 A person could make a moral judgement without being in any way motivated by it
4.2 p.96 Motivating reasons are psychological, while normative reasons are external
4.5 p.107 Subjects may be fallible about the desires which explain their actions
4.5 p.109 A person can have a desire without feeling it
4.7 p.119 Humeans (unlike their opponents) say that desires and judgements can separate
4.8 p.125 Goals need desires, and so only desires can motivate us
5.1 p.130 Humeans take maximising desire satisfaction as the normative reasons for actions
5.4 p.136 Is valuing something a matter of believing or a matter of desiring?
5.7 p.145 If first- and second-order desires conflict, harmony does not require the second-order to win
5.9 p.163 Capturing all the common sense facts about rationality is almost impossible
5.9 p.163 Defining a set of things by paradigms doesn't pin them down enough
5.9 p.165 We cannot expect even fully rational people to converge on having the same desires for action
5.9 p.175 Objective reasons to act might be the systematic desires of a fully rational person